cs.CL · 2026-09-17 · No. 116

Computation and Language, 2026-09-17.

16 new papers in cs.CL. Titles, authors, abstracts. Links to arXiv. Want this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe →

01 — The papers

16 entries
  1. 01

    Objective vs. Search: Decomposing What Makes a Good Tokeniser

    Ahmetcan Yavuz, Clara Meister, Tiago Pimentel

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Two dominant tokenisation algorithms are used by modern language models: byte-pair encoding (BPE) and UnigramLM. These differ along two orthogonal axes: their optimisation objective (compression vs. log-likelihood) and their search procedure (bottom-up merging vs. top-down pruning). Existing comparisons confound these axes, making it unclear whether their observed differences stem from what is being optimised vs. how it is being optimised. We...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.19145 · PDF

  2. 02

    A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

    Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi Lin

    cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG

    Direct preference alignment methods are widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because of their computational and memory efficiency. However, likelihood displacement motivates alternative ways to extract information from preference pairs with small likelihood margins. In this paper, we propose and analyze Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.19144 · PDF

  3. 03

    Monitoring and Discovering Reward Hacking with Internal Representations during LLM Evaluations

    Leon Bergen, Usha Bhalla, Andrew Lee, Barak Widawsky, Linas Nasvytis, Connor Watts, Siddharth Boppana, Sidharth...

    cs.CL · cs.LG

    As models scale, reward hacking becomes more frequent, more sophisticated, and more consequential. Does it leave a telltale signature in model representations? This work analyzes how reward hacking is represented internally in frontier open source LLMs, and how those representations can be used to understand and discover the range of hacking behaviors a model displays. In particular, we find that simple difference of means vectors coherently...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.19101 · PDF

  4. 04

    Reporting Practice Matters: The Impact of Reference Choice on Chest X-ray Report Evaluation

    Daniel P. Jeong, Charles Q. Li, Hossein Hosseiny, Nitya M. Bhalla, Fatma Uyar Morency, Pradeep Ravikumar, Zachary C....

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Radiologists follow heterogeneous reporting practices. Two radiologists examining the same image and identifying the same clinical findings might nevertheless compose superficially distinct reports, varying in terminology, shorthand, formatting, and level of detail. These variations in reporting norms represent an under-appreciated obstacle in efforts to evaluate AI-based radiology report generation (RRG) models, where machine-generated...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.19093 · PDF

  5. 05

    Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking

    Xinshuai Guo, Junjie Wu, Dolly Deng, Yinghui Li, Hai-Tao Zheng, Suncong Zheng, Maxm Pan

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Agent benchmarks are substantially more costly to evaluate than conventional LLM benchmarks. Benchmark compression is therefore a natural solution, yet existing methods primarily model redundancy in task--model final-score distributions, which is important in agentic evaluation. To address this limitation, we analyze large-scale trajectories and identify six complementary process signals that are systematically associated with final agent...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18909 · PDF

  6. 06

    A Scalable Framework for Automated NER Annotation Correction in Low-Resource Languages

    Toqeer Ehsan, Thamar Solorio

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Poor quality or noisy annotations in Named Entity Recognition (NER), as in any other NLP task, make it challenging to achieve state-of-the-art performance. In this paper, we present a multi-step framework to enhance the annotation quality of NER datasets by employing automated techniques. We propose a frequency-based iterative approach that leverages self-training and a dual-threshold mechanism to enhance inference confidence. Experimental...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18739 · PDF

  7. 07

    Fallacy Benchmarks Measure Scheme Recognition, Not Fallacy Detection

    Navyansh Singh, Animesh Pathak, Aarav Singh

    cs.CL · cs.LG

    Fallacy-detection benchmarks pair fallacy classes with a single "valid" or "none" class that takes everything data collection did not label as a fallacy. This construction is misleading: a classifier can learn cues that do well on this class without learning to tell a fallacy from a correct argument. We show that the low false-positive rates benchmarks report are an artifact of how the class is built, not evidence of detection ability. The...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18644 · PDF

  8. 08

    PACT: Can Enterprise AI Assistants Be Trusted Under Pressure?

    Mika Okamoto, Ansel Kaplan Erol

    cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CY · cs.LG

    As corporate AI adoption continues to grow, enterprise-grade LLM agents are being deployed into sensitive contexts such as hiring, healthcare, and finance. In these contexts, compliance with rules specified in an agent's system context is a first-order legal concern. Currently, no evaluation framework systematically measures which LLM models tend to violate compliance rules, especially under pressure from a persistent user, a hurried manager,...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18605 · PDF

  9. 09

    Attention Dispersion as a Diagnostic Signal for Hallucination in Large Language Models

    Shardul P. More, Tanuja S. Pawar

    cs.CL · cs.LG

    Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit hallucinations, presenting a major barrier to reliability in complex reasoning tasks. While traditional detection methods rely on output-based confidence metrics, these logits are often miscalibrated by modern alignment techniques. In this paper, we investigate the temporal volatility of internal attention mechanisms as an alternative diagnostic signal for hallucination that does not depend on...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18320 · PDF

  10. 10

    Knowledge-Graph Based Augmentation versus Retrieval Augmented Generation for Cultural-Related Question Answering

    Pablo Poulenard, Yannis Karmim, Valentin Barrière

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Large language models (LLMs) suffer from a long-tail deficit: culturally specific facts, particularly those concerning underrepresented regions such as Latin America, appear too rarely in pretraining corpora to be reliably memorized. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by grounding generation in external text, but structured alternatives such as Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer tighter control over what enters the context, along...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18317 · PDF

  11. 11

    I code or AI code: A comparative evaluation of AI-rated scores in classroom observations

    Y. Fong, J. Xiang, T. Y. D. Chan, K. Lee, E. Y. H. Lau

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Classroom observations are widely recognized as a key tool for establishing benchmarks of education quality and guiding pedagogical improvement, yet they remain resource-intensive and dependent on trained observers. This study evaluated the feasibility of using a LLM (GPT-5 model) to score teacher-child interactions in early childhood classrooms, benchmarked against human raters. The study analyzed 87 video-recorded observations from 38...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18274 · PDF

  12. 12

    Beyond Accuracy: How Procedural Traces Shift the Decision Criterion of LLM Overseers

    Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Zheng, Weiling Li

    cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CY · cs.HC

    Organizations increasingly use oversight loops where one large language model (LLM) audits another's outputs alongside procedural traces of claimed steps. A common concern about such LLM-as-a-judge pipelines is that detailed traces make overseers gullible. Using signal detection theory, we audit five LLM overseers on 19 compliance tasks (4,551 analyzed judgments), varying only trace detail and evidence labeling. With disconfirming evidence...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18204 · PDF

  13. 13

    Behavior2Value: Benchmarking and Empowering LLMs for Consumer Value Measurement from E-commerce Behaviors

    Peixuan Hou, Bin Chen, Li He, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng, Xiuli Ma, Guojie Song

    cs.CL · cs.LG

    Human values are deep motivational orientations that shape human behaviors. In e-commerce, they reveal the stable drivers behind users' purchase decisions. Compared with short-term interests, consumer values better explain how users evaluate products before purchase. However, consumer values are often implicit in complex and fragmented behavioral trajectories, leaving value measurement from e-commerce behaviors largely underexplored. To this...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18203 · PDF

  14. 14

    DualSQL: Text-to-SQL with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    Shijie Chen, Yu Gan, Yeounoh Chung, Jiani Zhang, Quannan Li, Sravan Babu Bodapati, Cody J. Greer, Yu Su, Fatma Ozcan

    cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.DB

    State-of-the-art Text-to-SQL systems are typically multi-agent pipelines centered around two fundamental tasks: schema linking and SQL generation. However, existing work trains separate models for each task, failing to leverage the synergy between these interrelated tasks. In this work, we propose DualSQL, a new Text-to-SQL system consisting of two agents powered by a single model backbone. The agents share the same model weights and agentic...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18135 · PDF

  15. 15

    Linguistic Triggers of Gender and Racial Bias in Open-Weight LLMs Applied to Recruitment

    Kosuke Kitahara, Nobuhiro Yamaguchi

    cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CY

    Open-weight large language models are rapidly entering hiring pipelines, yet their discriminatory failure modes -- and the regulatory exposure these create under the EU AI Act high-risk classification (Annex III) and U.S. EEOC adverse-impact analysis -- remain poorly understood. We present the first systematic, multi-model audit of open-weight LLMs that treats job-posting language as the primary experimental variable, evaluating six models...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18106 · PDF

  16. 16

    From a River in Gilead to the Inference Distributions of Large Language Models: Covert Dialect Bias and Linguistic Profiling at Scale

    Chowdhury Mohammad Abdullah, Rita Orji

    cs.CL · cs.AI

    Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as housing screening. While alignment techniques mitigate explicit racial bias in generated text, they often leave covert attitudinal associations in internal probability distributions untouched. Adapting the matched-guise sociolinguistic paradigm, we examine covert dialect bias in housing-related social judgments across four varieties: Standard American...

    arxiv.org/abs/2609.18068 · PDF

This edition is part of The Daily Abstract — cs.CL archive. Subscribe to receive these in your inbox each morning, automatically translated to Spanish, with reply-to-PDF: arxivdaily.ignorelist.com.

Colophon Set in Georgia, with system sans for interface chrome and a monospaced stack for code and paper identifiers. Sole accent: amber #D99C5E. Built and served on an always-free VM. The masthead is set 14% letterspaced because newspapers do that and it works.