stat.ML · 2026-07-13 · No. 52
Machine Learning, 2026-07-13.
4 new papers in stat.ML. Titles, authors,
abstracts. Links to arXiv. Want this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe →
01 — The papers
4 entries-
01
Deep Gaussian Processes on Directed Acyclic Graphs
Federico L. Perlino, Oliver Hamelijnck, Adam M. Johansen, Theodoros Damoulas
stat.ML · cs.LG · math.ST · stat.CO · stat.ME
Many real-world processes can be represented as compositions of functions along a directed acyclic graph (DAG). In causal modelling, these correspond to the underlying mechanisms; in engineering, to multiple fidelity levels; and in gene-regulatory networks, to transcription factors. These functions are partially observed across the DAG, with noisy and heterogeneously sampled measurements, posing significant challenges for reconstruction,...
-
02
Spectrally Deconfounded Gradient Boosting
Andrea Nava, Peter Bühlmann, Fabio Sigrist
stat.ML · cs.LG
Flexible machine-learning methods can be sensitive to hidden confounding: they may learn associations induced by unobserved confounders rather than stable signals. Spectral deconfounding mitigates this problem by shrinking high-variance directions of the covariate matrix that, under dense confounding, carry latent confounder information. Existing work has largely focused on linear models. We develop a nonlinear spectral deconfounding...
-
03
Influence Diagnostics in High-dimensional M-estimation: Precise Asymptotics
Hugo Cui
stat.ML · cs.LG
The impact of a given training point on a statistical model is classically measured through its leave-one-out influence, which quantifies the effect of its removal from the training set on the model accuracy. While the statistics of leave-one-out influences are well understood in the low-dimensional, large sample limit $n\to \infty, d=O(1)$, they become more intricate in high dimensions, as the influence of a given sample develops non-trivial...
-
04
Score Accuracy Along the Forward Diffusion Does Not Certify Numerical Stability in Diffusion Sampling
Yiwei Zhou
stat.ML · cs.LG · math.NA · math.PR
Score matching controls average error under the forward marginals, but a discretized reverse-time sampler evaluates the learned score along its own trajectory. We show that small forward-marginal error does not guarantee numerical stability. We construct a single smooth score field with arbitrarily small forward-marginal $L^2$ error. The learned reverse-time process is nonexplosive, has moments of every order, and can be arbitrarily close to...
This edition is part of The Daily Abstract — stat.ML archive. Subscribe to receive these in your inbox each morning, automatically translated to Spanish, with reply-to-PDF: arxivdaily.ignorelist.com.
#D99C5E. Built and served on an always-free VM. The masthead is set 14% letterspaced because newspapers do that and it works.